Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Pritchett et al v. United Parcel Services Inc
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cain Pritchett, Micheal Arnold, Bradley Barkley and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Larkin et al v. UAB Medicine Enterprise et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Defendant:
UAB Medicine Enterprise, UAB Health System and UAB Hospital Management LLC
Plaintiff:
Danielle Larkin and Mia Neustein
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fair et al v. DRG Southwest, LLC
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Fair, Anthony Evans and Boartavis Davis
Defendant:
DRG Southeast, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Daniels v. Legacy Funeral Group
as 7:2021cv01262
Plaintiff:
Richard Daniels
Defendant:
Legacy Funeral Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Green v. CT Hauling and Materials LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01698
Plaintiff:
Daniel Green
Defendant:
CT Hauling and Materials LLC and Clifford Trumbly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Glass et al v. O'Conner et al
as 5:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Tywana Glass , Sarah Smith , Deondre Burress and others
Defendant:
Daniel O'Conner, III, Douglas Weaver, Sr. and Salty Gator Trading Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. Communication Unlimited Inc
as 2:2016cv01337
Plaintiff:
Daniel Johnson
Defendant:
Communication Unlimited Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Passmore et al
as 2:2016cv00192
Plaintiff:
Daniel King
Defendant:
Wes Passmore and Classic Towing & Recovery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nguyen v. Vinh Ho Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01488
Plaintiff:
Daniel T Nguyen
Defendant:
Vinh Ho Inc, Creation-By-Lam, Inc and Thao Ha
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
