Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Davis v. Estes Express Lines
as 2:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Adolphus A. Davis, II
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Roberson v. Omega Demolition Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv11127
Plaintiff:
Jimmy T. Roberson, II
Defendant:
Omega Demolition Corp. and Charles P Gerage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
TODD v. MID-STATE AUTOMOTIVE II, INC. et al
as 5:2016cv00535
Plaintiff:
ERIC M TODD
Defendant:
MID-STATE AUTOMOTIVE II, INC., BYRON AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, SWAP IT UP AUTO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617
Johnson et al v. Moody et al
as 4:2016cv00449
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Johnson and Shelly Johnson
Defendant:
Mike Moody , Brian Mathis , Dana Wingert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wheat v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
Marvin Wheat, II
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Newman v. Shelby County Board Of Education et al
as 2:2016cv02127
Plaintiff:
Robert Newman
Defendant:
Shelby County Board Of Education and Dorsey E. Hopson, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Breland v. Woodhouse Day Spa et al
as 2:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Melinda Breland
Defendant:
Woodhouse Day Spa, Dew Spa LLC, Dew Spa II LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
EVANS v. EXCEL HOLDINGS II LLC et al
as 1:2015cv08164
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVANS
Defendant:
EXCEL HOLDINGS II LLC , PYRAMID HOSPITALITY TEAM, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
LITTLE II v. HARTFORD BAKERY, INC.
as 3:2015cv00017
Defendant:
HARTFORD BAKERY, INC.
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LITTLE II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Mosteller v. Frontier Communications of West Virginia
as 2:2014cv29018
Plaintiff:
Michael Mosteller, II
Defendant:
Frontier Communications of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
