Cases 121 - 130 of 705
Irwin v. Fry Communications, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00186
Defendant:
Fry Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Irwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Katavitch v. Ulta Beauty Inc.
as 1:2021cv00540
Plaintiff:
Robert Katavitch
Defendant:
Ulta Beauty Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Munchak v. ERG Staffing Agency et al
as 3:2021cv00203
Defendant:
ERG Staffing Agency and Process Tech & Packaging
Plaintiff:
Rosa Y. Munchak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCALIA v. LOCAL 98, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS
as 2:2021cv00096
Defendant:
LOCAL 98, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SCALIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
ACCLAIM SYSTEMS, INC. v. CHALLA et al
as 2:2020cv06499
Defendant:
HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY and SUNIL KUMAR CHALLA
Plaintiff:
ACCLAIM SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goff v. Cummins, Inc.
as 1:2020cv02423
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Goff
Defendant:
Cummins, Inc. doing business as Cummins Sales and Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mitchell v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2020cv06152
Plaintiff:
Robert Mitchell
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
PATTERSON v. URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC et al
as 2:2020cv01840
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PATTERSON
Defendant:
URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC and TEMP2TECH AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KINITZ v. CENTRAL ADMIXTURE PHARMACY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 5:2020cv06013
Defendant:
CENTRAL ADMIXTURE PHARMACY SERVICES, INC., B. BRAUN MEDICAL, INC., B. BRAUN OF AMERICA INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KINITZ and ROBERT M. KINITZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SERENARI v. PITTSBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2020cv01994
Plaintiff:
STACY SERENARI
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH SCHOOL DISGTRICT and PITTSBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
