Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Kowa Company, Ltd. et al v. Hetero Drugs Limited et al
as 1:2017cv00762
Plaintiff:
Kowa Company, Ltd. , Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd.
Defendant:
Hetero Drugs Limited, Hetero Labs Limited, Hetero Labs Limited Unit-V and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CELGENE CORPORATION v. HETERO LABS LIMITED et al
as 2:2017cv03387
Plaintiff:
CELGENE CORPORATION
Defendant:
HETERO LABS LIMITED, HETERO LABS LIMITED UNIT-V, HETERO DRUGS LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al v. Hetero USA Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00376
Plaintiff:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.
Defendant:
Hetero USA Inc., Hetero Labs Limited and Hetero Labs Limited Unit-V
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA et al
as 2:2014cv01643
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY , DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. , DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Defendant:
ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA, ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC., INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC., USA et al
as 1:2014cv00389
Defendant:
ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC., USA, ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC., ACTAVIS INC. and others
D/b/a ZYDUS CADILA:
CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.
Counter Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Counter Claimant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al v. Hetero Drugs Limited et al
as 1:2011cv08302
Plaintiff:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Hetero Drugs Limited , Hetero Labs Limited Unit V , Hetero USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
