Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Franchi v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00415
Defendant:
Charles L. Atwood, Stephen Comer, Ron Huberman and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Ohigashi v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00387
Defendant:
Charles L. Atwood, Stephen Comer, Ron Huberman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ohigashi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Smith v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00314
Defendant:
Charles L. Atwood, Stephen Comer, Ron Huberman and others
Plaintiff:
George Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Securities and Exchange Commis v. Ishopnomarkup.com, Inc.
as 17-1519
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Ishopnomarkup.com, Inc., Scott W. Brockop and Moussa Yeroushalmi, AKA Mike Yerosh
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthony M. Knight
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Knight
as 3:2016cv02076
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Anthony M. Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moskal v. Pandit
as 13-3577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stanley Moskal, derivatively on behalf of Citigroup, Inc., Silvester Sciuto, derivatively on behalf of Citigroup Inc. and James Kenney, derivatively on behalf of Citigroup Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Vikram Pandit, John C. Gerspach, John P. Havens and others
NADLER v. CHARMING SHOPPES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv02838
Plaintiff:
JUDITH KAYE NADLER
Defendant:
CHARMING SHOPPES, INC., MICHAEL GOLDSTEIN, KATHERINE M. HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Kenny v. Pandit et al
as 1:2012cv03453
Plaintiff:
James Kenny
Defendant:
Vikram S. Pandit, John C. Gerspach, John P. Havens and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sciuto v. Pandit et al
as 1:2012cv03422
Plaintiff:
Silvester Sciuto
Defendant:
Vikram Pandit, John C. Gerpsach, John P. Havens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
