Cases 11 - 20 of 20,782
Crawford v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
Damon Crawford
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vaughan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv01176
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Francine Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clarke v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv06788
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pizarro v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv06789
Plaintiff:
Carlos Pizarro
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Schwartz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Lewis L. Schwartz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hopper v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01159
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Shana Hopper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McCleod v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv07185
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Claudene McCleod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv06672
Plaintiff:
Sharena K. Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wiskup v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00892
Plaintiff:
Donald J Wiskup, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
