Cases 81 - 90 of 194
NCAA, et al v. Governor of New Jersey, et al
as 14-4568
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association, NBA, a joint venture, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY, DAVID L. REBUCK, Director of the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement and Assistant Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, FRANK ZANZUCCKI, Executive Director of the New Jersey Racing Commission and others
Defendant - Appellant:
VINCENT PRIETO, Speaker of the New Jersey General Assembly and STEPHEN M. SWEENEY, President of the New Jersey Senate
NCAA, et al v. Governor of New Jersey, et al
as 14-4546
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association, NATIONAL BASEBALL ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY, DAVID L. REBUCK, Director of the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement and Assistant Attorney General of the State of New Jersey and FRANK ZANZUCCKI, Executive Director of the New Jersey Racing Commission
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY THOROUGHBRED HORSEMENS ASSOCIATION INC, NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXPOSITION AUTHORITY, STEPHEN M. SWEENEY, President of the New Jersey Senate and others
Consumer Financial Protection, et al v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 14-5265
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General's Office, State of Alaska, Alaska Attorney General's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Movant - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
USA, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 14-5247
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Movant - Appellant:
Daniel J. Levitan
Fox Rx, Inc. v. Pharmerica Corp.
as 14-3501
Plaintiff:
ABC, State of North Carolina, State of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fox Rx, Inc., ex rel United States of America
Defendant:
DEF and MHA Long Term Care Network
Defendant - Appellee:
Pharmerica Corp., Neighborcare, Inc., Omnicare, Incorporated and others
The United States of America v. Walgreen Company
as 14-3392
Plaintiff:
ABC, The State of Maryland, The State of Minnesota and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fox Rx, Inc., ex rel.
Defendant:
DEF
Defendant - Appellee:
Walgreen Company
Estate of Robert Cunningham v. Millennium Laboratories of Cal
as 14-1911
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel Robert Cunningham, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, ex rel and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF ROBERT CUNNINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
Brown et al v. BankUnited Trust 2005-1 et al
as 1:2014cv22855
Plaintiff:
Susan Brown , David Stone , United States of America and others
Defendant:
BankUnited Trust 2005-1, BankUnited, NA , Bear Sterns and Successors and or Assigns and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729
USA ex rel. Todd Heath v. AT&T, Inc., et al
as 14-7094
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Todd Heath, State of California, Attorney General's Office; California Department of Justice. ex rel. Todd Heath, State of Delaware, Department of Justice; Attorney General's Office, ex rel. Todd Heath and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd Heath
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corp., doing business as AT&T Advanced Solutions, AT&T Datacomm, Inc., doing business as AT&T Datacomm and others
James Judd, et al v. Quest Diagnostics Inc
as 14-3156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES JUDD, MD
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
