Cases 1 - 10 of 27
City of New York v. EnviroMD Group LLC et al
as 1:2024cv05161
Defendant:
Vape Plus Distribution Corp., Star Zone Inc., KLCC Wholesale INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re Application for Order for International Judicial Assistance
as 3:2021mc80274
In Re:
Request for International Assistance from the Taiwan High Court, Kaohsiung Branch Court in Taiwan, in Han-Chang Huang v. Yu-Fan Chung Yu, Ref. No. 109-Nian-Du-Shang-Zih No. 78 DJ Ref. No. 189-279-21-3 and Application for Order for International Judicial Assistance
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv03046
Plaintiff:
ASHH, INC., D/B/A OOZE WHOLESALE and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
DJ IMPORT INC. D/B/A SUPER DIAMOND IMPORT & WHOLESALE
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Jobe v. Johnson
as 3:2021cv00513
Plaintiff:
Cody Jobe
Defendant:
Darnell Johnson doing business as DJ's Auto Sales
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701
Roberts v. Smith et al
as 8:2021cv00524
Defendant:
Guy Cottrell, United States Postal Inspection Service and DJ Smith
Plaintiff:
Frederic Blair Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
DJ v. Google, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00645
Defendant:
Vlad TV, Drake and Google, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Longo et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00585
Plaintiff:
Robert Healy, Keyshla Velez, Joe Darg and others
Defendant:
GoSmith Inc., Matthew Ehrlichman, Darwin Widjaja and others
D.R. v. Hickey et al
as 3:2020cv00411
Defendant:
Pamela Stutzka, Does 1 Through 10, Dj-Banyan Investments LLC and others
Plaintiff:
D.R.
Guardian Ad Litem:
Sandra Beymer
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. DJ & IQ, LLC
as 3:2019cv00779
Defendant:
DJ & IQ, LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Broughton v. DJ Acquisitions, LLC
as 1:2019cv00833
Defendant:
DJ Acquisitions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ted Broughton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.