Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Daretha Braziel, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 23-1954
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARETHA BRAZIEL, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of RB, next friend of DB, next friend of DR, KEESHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of KJ, next friend of DJ, next friend of TC, next friend of KB, IEASHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan and others
Defendant:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, iindividually and in her official capacity, STATE OF MICHIGAN, Environment, Great Lakes & Energy, LIESL CLARK, Director, individually and in her official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCUS MUHAMMAD, Mayor, individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL O'MALLEY, Water Plant Operator, individually and in his official capacity and CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, a Municipal Corporation, through the Benton Harbor Water Department
Braziel et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2021cv00960
Plaintiff:
Doretha Braziel, Ronesha Braziel, Deana Braziel and others
Defendant:
Governor Gretchen Whitmer, State of Michigan - Environment, Great Lakes & Energy, Director Liesi Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
ONDA, et al v. USFS, et al
as 18-35514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and ROGER W. WILLIAMS, Malheur National Forest Supervisor
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFF HUSSEY, SHERRI HUSSEY, MARK JOYCE and others
Darwin v. Gencorp Incorporated et al
as 2:2013cv01631
Defendant:
Gencorp Incorporated , HTM USA Holdings Incorporated and Penn Racquet Sports Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Henry R Darwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
In re: Polar Bear Endangered Specie
as 11-5354
In Re:
In re: Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and 4(d) Rule Litigation - MDL 1993
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Safari Club International, Safari Club International Foundation, State of Alaska and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Conservation Force, Aaron Neilson, Kevin Wieczorek and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dirk Kempthorne, H. Dale Hall, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Alaska Oil And Gas Association, Edison Electric Institute, The Humane Society of the United States and others
In re: Polar Bear Endangered Specie
as 11-5353
In Re:
In re: Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and 4(d) Rule Litigation - MDL 1993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Safari Club International, Safari Club International Foundation, Don Hershey and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of Alaska, American Petroleum Institute, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dirk Kempthorne, H. Dale Hall, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Alaska Oil And Gas Association, Edison Electric Institute, The Humane Society of the United States and others
CONSERVATION FORCE et al v. KEMPTHORNE et al
as 1:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
CONSERVATION FORCE, INUVIALUIT GAME COUNCIL, ARVIAT HUNTERS AND TRAPPERS ORGANIZATION and others
Defendant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, H. DALE HALL and U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USA v. Atlas Lederer Co, et al
as 3:1991cv00309
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Atlas Lederer Company , GMC , Senser Metal Co Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
David J Joseph Co and United Scrap Lead Respondent Group
Counter_defendant:
USA
Counter_claimant:
GMC
Cross_defendant:
Atlas Lederer Company , GMC , Senser Metal Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
