Cases 1 - 10 of 318
CALIFORNIA TABLE GRAPE COMMISSION et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2024cv02645
Defendant:
MICHAEL WATSON, THOMAS J. VILSACK and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA TABLE GRAPE COMMISSION, NATIONAL GRAPE RESEARCH ALLIANCE and CALIFORNIA TABLE GRAPE EXPORT ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Kansas, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 24-3097
Defendant:
MIGUEL CARDONA, United States Secretary of Education, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND, United States Attorney General, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
MOMS FOR LIBERTY, STATE OF ALASKA, FEMALE ATHLETES UNITED and others
Amicus Curiae:
FLOYD ABRAMS, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
TN, et al v. Miguel Cardona, et al
as 24-5588
Amicus Curiae:
KATIE EYER, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEBORAH WIDISS and others
Intervenor:
A.C., by her next friend and mother Next Friend, Abigail Cross and CHRISTIAN EDUCATORS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL
Plaintiff:
STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant:
MIGUEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
BURLEY et al v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2024cv02455
Defendant:
HARLEY LONG, DEB HAALAND, AMY DUTSCHKE and others
Plaintiff:
MILDRED FERN BURLEY, SILVIA FAWN BURLEY, CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Peavy v. California Victim Compensation Claims Board
as 3:2024cv01351
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Peavy
Defendant:
California Victim Compensation Claims Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process
State Of Texas v. Becerra et al
as 6:2024cv00211
Defendant:
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Director Melanie Fontes Rainer and others
Plaintiff:
State of Montana and State Of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ASG Solutions Corporation et al v. Department of the Navy et al
as 3:2024cv01297
Plaintiff:
ASG Solutions Corporation a California corporation doing business as American Systems Group and Ritobrata Banerjee
Defendant:
Department of the Navy, Allison McDade and Department of the Navy Suspension and Debarment Official
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration et al
as 6:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Longview Chamber of Commerce, Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and others
Amicus Curiae:
International Foodservice Distributors Association, American Hotel & Lodging Association, American Road & Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General Department of Justice, Julie A. Su, Douglas L. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Arkansas et al v. United States Department of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
The State of Arkansas, The State of Missouri, The State of Iowa and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, Catherine E. Lhamon and others
Amicus Curiae:
Esq. State of California and National Women's Law Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Min Ji Kang v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 8:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
SEUNG MIN OH, MIN JI KANG and YONG KUEN OH
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
