Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Arizona, State of v. Meadows
as 2:2024cv02063
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of
Defendant: Mark Meadows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Meadows v. Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2019cv00394
Defendant: BAE Systems, Inc., Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. and BAE Systems Ordnance Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jeffrey S. Meadows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rolling Meadows Police Department et al v. Simmons et al
as 1:2018cv07726
Defendant: Kristen R Simmons and Renee Sharon Lloyd: Al
Plaintiff: People of the State of Illinois and Rolling Meadows Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al v. Residential Land Corporation of Nevada et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00324
Defendant: Alessi & Koenig, LLC, LVDG LLC Series 107, Residential Land Corporation of Nevada and others
Plaintiff: Federal National Mortgage Association and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Champion et al v. Craddock et al
as 5:2016cv00540
Plaintiff: Shelia Champion and The Good Earth, LLC
Defendant: Mark N. Craddock , Lorenzo Wright , Sammy Seroyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BH Ventures, LLC et al v. City of Lone Tree, Colorado We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01857
Plaintiff: BH Ventures, LLC and 9271 Park Meadows Drive, LLC
Defendant: City of Lone Tree, Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Planned Parenthood, et al v. Nebraskans United for Life We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3298
Plaintiff - Appellee: Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and Dr. Jill L. Meadows
Defendant - Appellee: Dave Heineman, Governor of Nebraska, in his official capacity, Jon Bruning, Attorney General of Nebraska, in his official capacity, Kerry Winterer, Chief Executive Officer, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services in his official capacity and others
Movant: Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund, Coalition on Abortion and Breast Cancer, Creighton Students for Life and others
Movant - Appellant: Nebraskans United for Life, doing business as NuLife Pregnancy Resource Center
Planned Parenthood, et al v. Nebraskans United for Life
as 10-3084
Plaintiff - Appellee: Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and Dr. Jill L. Meadows
Defendant: Dave Heineman, Governor of Nebraska, in his official capacity, Jon Bruning, Attorney General of Nebraska, in his official capacity, Kerry Winterer, Chief Executive Officer, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services in his official capacity and others
Movant: Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund, Coalition on Abortion and Breast Cancer, Creighton Students for Life and others
Movant - Appellant: Nebraskans United for Life, doing business as NuLife Pregnancy Resource Center
Arizona Green Party et al v. Bennett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01902
Plaintiff: Arizona Green Party and Claudia Ellquist
Defendant: Ken Bennett , LeNora Johnson, Jim Claw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood, et al v. Nebraskans United for Life
as 10-2861
Plaintiff - Appellee: Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and Dr. Jill L. Meadows
Defendant: Dave Heineman, Governor of Nebraska, in his official capacity, Jon Bruning, Attorney General of Nebraska, in his official capacity, Kerry Winterer, Chief Executive Officer, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services in his official capacity and others
Movant: Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund, Coalition on Abortion and Breast Cancer, Creighton Students for Life and others
Movant - Appellant: Nebraskans United for Life, doing business as NuLife Pregnancy Resource Center

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?