Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Newman v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00371
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Newman
Defendant:
One Reverse Mortgage, LLC and Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Southall et al v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01242
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
DeeAnn Southall and Dennis Southall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Eklund et al v. American Brokers Conduit et al
as 1:2011cv03059
Defendant:
American Brokers Conduit, American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Plaintiff:
Pauline E. Eklund and Thomas C. Eklund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Sawyer et al v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv06034
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Fidelity National Title Insurance Company and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kevin T. Sawyer and Tamara L. Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jackson v. Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv06342
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc. and Reconstruct Company N.A.
Plaintiff:
Troy J. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rinehart et al v. Onewest Bank FSB et al
as 6:2010cv06331
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc., Onewest Bank FSB and Regional Trustee Services Corporation
Plaintiff:
Dustin R. Rinehart and Stacey Rinehart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rogers v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00844
Plaintiff:
Peter Rogers
Defendant:
Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. and State Farm Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
