Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Big Lee Repairs and Tiles, Company, Inc., d/b/a Big Lee Cistern Services v. DeJoy et al
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Big Lee Repairs and Tiles, Company, Inc., d/b/a Big Lee Cistern Services and Big Lee Repairs and Tiles, Company, Inc. doing business as Big Lee Cistern Services
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, Louis Berger US, Inc. and U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
FERGUSON v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2019cv01689
Defendant:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
TRACEY FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Winchester v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2017cv12444
Plaintiff:
Vincent Winchester
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Winchester v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2017cv12385
Plaintiff:
Vincent Winchester
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Matthews v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2015cv02807
Plaintiff:
George D. Matthews
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Warren Taylor v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 15-10481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN ADAM TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and POSTMASTER GENERAL, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
WALSH et al v. AINBINDER et al
as 3:2014cv05901
Plaintiff:
JAMES WALSH and NEW JERSEY COMMERCIAL CLEANING SERVICE
Defendant:
MATT AINBINDER and U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pack v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2013cv03187
Plaintiff:
Michael Lawrence Pack
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
ARMSTRONG v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2013cv05567
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crestmark TPG, LLC v. U.S. Midwest Freight, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv11574
Plaintiff:
Crestmark TPG, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Midwest Freight, Inc., Gueorgui Kazakov and U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
