Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Minden Pictures, Inc. v. American Chinese Media L.L.C.
as 1:2022cv01716
Defendant:
American Chinese Media L.L.C. and American Chinese Life L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Minden Pictures, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Diatek Licensing LLC v. Red Bull Media House North America, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01283
Plaintiff:
Diatek Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Red Bull Media House North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Schwartz v. KEF Media Associates, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Andrew Schwartz
Defendant:
KEF Media Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
McGlynn v. Cumulus Media, Inc.
as 1:2021cv05194
Plaintiff:
David McGlynn
Defendant:
Cumulus Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Clark v. Diamond Diaspora Media, Inc.
as 1:2021cv05193
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clark
Defendant:
Diamond Diaspora Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Laman v. Morris Visitor Publications LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
Tim Laman
Defendant:
Morris Visitor Publications, LLC doing business as Wheretraveler, William S. Morris, IV, Media Bakery, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hirsch v. Urban Islandz Media LLC et al
as 1:2021cv04997
Plaintiff:
Steven Hirsch
Defendant:
Urban Islandz Media LLC, Nickoy Campbell and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Chevrestt v. Diamond Diaspora Media, LLC
as 1:2021cv04847
Plaintiff:
Angel Chevrestt
Defendant:
Diamond Diaspora Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Sadowski v. SWAGGGirlicious Media, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03305
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Defendant:
SWAGGGirlicious Media, LLC, Adrienne Lawson and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
McGlynn v. Diamond Diaspora Media, LLC
as 1:2021cv02466
Plaintiff:
David McGlynn
Defendant:
Diamond Diaspora Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
