Cases 1 - 10 of 35
UBEO, LLC v. DOCUmation, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00415
Defendant:
Kimberly Ball, Lewis Bullion, DOCUmation, Inc. and others
Counter Plaintiff:
Lewis Bullion, DOCUmation, Inc., Cordy Raney and others
Counter Defendant:
UBEO, LLC, UBEO, LLC, UBEO, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
UBEO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Back Bay Medical, Inc. v. Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01588
Plaintiff:
Back Bay Medical, Inc.
Defendant:
Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. and Cordis Corporation
QualiQode, LLC v. Cordys, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
QualiQode, LLC
Defendant:
Cordys, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kardiametrics LLC v. Cordis Corporation
as 1:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
Kardiametrics LLC
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kardiametrics LLC v. Cordis Corporation
as 1:2013cv01593
Plaintiff:
Kardiametrics LLC
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Medinol, Ltd. v. Cordis Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01408
Plaintiff:
Medinol, Ltd.
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Civil Action to Obtain Patent
LifeScreen Sciences LLC v. Cordis Corporation
as 6:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
LifeScreen Sciences LLC
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
LifeScreen Sciences LLC v. Cordis Corporation
as 6:2012cv01024
Plaintiff:
LifeScreen Sciences LLC
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cordis Corporation v. Kappos et al
as 1:2011cv00127
Plaintiff:
Cordis Corporation
Defendant:
David J. Kappos and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Intervenor:
Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
EVM Systems, LLC v. Cordis Corporation et al
as 6:2010cv00437
Plaintiff:
EVM Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation, Boston Scientific Corporation, Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
