Cases 21 - 30 of 877
Darden v. O'Malley
as 5:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Dennis Darden
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Leduc v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv06188
Plaintiff:
Dennis J Leduc
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv01662
Plaintiff:
Dennis J Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rosa v. Kijakazi et al
as 1:2023cv12694
Plaintiff:
Gricely Rosa
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Dennis W Ranker
Kinder v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv05391
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dennis Kinder
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Young v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Dennis Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schriver v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02556
Plaintiff:
Dennis Schriver
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nicholas v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Michael Dennis Nicholas
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
