Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Davis v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00543
Plaintiff:
Timothy Raymond Davis
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
DAVIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00567
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
JUDITH KAY DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DAVIS V. COLVIN
as 4:2016cv00020
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MANLEY-DAIVS v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv01899
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
JUNE K. MANLEY-DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DAVIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv01731
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
RYAN E. DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
DAVIS v. COLVIN
as 3:2014cv00115
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
ROBIN DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DAVIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01993
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
KENDRA M. DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
DAVIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01694
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
SHANIKA R. DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
DAVIS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01101
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DAVIS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00366
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE L. DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
