Cases 11 - 20 of 143
Cisco Systems, Inc., et al v. Wilson Chung, et al
as 23-15590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation and CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
WILSON CHUNG and PLANTRONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
JAMES HE, JEDD WILLIAMS and THOMAS PUORRO
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
as 23-1809
Appellant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Appellee:
VIRNETX INC.
Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.
as 5:2023mc80086
Petitioner:
Centripetal Networks, LLC
Respondent:
Cisco Systems Inc.
VirnetX Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 23-1765
Appellant:
VIRNETX INC.
Appellee:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
In Re: Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Directed to Nonparties iPEL, Inc. and Brian Yates
as 2:2023mc00041
Plaintiff:
K. MIZRA, LLC
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
In Re:
In Re: Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Directed to Nonparties iPEL, Inc. and Brian Yates
Respondent:
iPel, Inc. and Brian Yates
Interested Party:
Microsoft Corporation
In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III)
as 3:2017md02801
Defendant:
Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III), Panasonic Corporation, KEMET Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Chip-Tech, Ltd., Michael Brooks, Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated and others
Respondent:
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Aptiv Services US, LLC
Intervenor:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Quathimatine Holdings, Inc., HP, Inc. and Dell Inc.
Claimant:
Certain Members of Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Settlement Class
Interested Party:
Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
Advanced Cluster Systems, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 5:2022mc80208
Respondent:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Petitioner:
Advanced Cluster Systems, Inc.
VirnetX Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 22-2234
Appellant:
VIRNETX INC.
Appellee:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
