Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Andrews v. South Carolina DSS et al
as 0:2018cv02216
Defendant:
David Hamilton, South Carolina DSS, Jessica E. Dingle and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick J. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
David Hamilton v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2017cv08154
Petitioner:
David Hamilton
Respondent:
Warden Lizzarraga and People of the State of California
David Hamilton v. Joe Lizarraga
as 17-72498
Petitioner:
DAVID HAMILTON
Respondent:
JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, Warden
In re: Kenneth Lewi
as 17-1694
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant - Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, JUDGE JAMES E. SHADID and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT B. KUGLAR
Michael Barber, et al v. Cordis Corporation
as 16-80140
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MICHAEL BARBER, ANDREW CLOS, JACQUELYN HANSON and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CORDIS CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hatamian et al v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00226
Plaintiff:
Babak Hatamian and Lussu Dennj Salvatore
Defendant:
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Rory P. Read, Thomas J. Seifert and others
Petitioner:
KBC Asset Management NV, Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System, Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Hamilton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-13426
Plaintiff:
Becky Hamilton and David Hamilton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Hamilton v. Spurling et al
as 3:2011cv00102
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Defendant:
Gordon J Spurling, Westside Therapy Group and Midwest Healthcare Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
