Cases 11 - 20 of 2,879
Eisele v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Eisele
Defendant:
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Price v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 5:2024rt55027
Defendant:
Nokian Tyres Inc., Michelin North America Inc, Kumho Tire U.S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Percy Price
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Curran et al v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 5:2024rt55021
Defendant:
Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA, Pirelli & C S.p.A., Nokian Tyres plc and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Borland and Michael Curran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Slingshot Printing LLC v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.
as 24-1956
Appellant:
SLINGSHOT PRINTING LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CANON U.S.A., INC. and CANON INC.
Sun Group U.S.A. Harmony City, Inc. v. CRRC Corporation, Ltd.
as 24-3680
Plaintiff:
SUN GROUP U.S.A. HARMONY CITY, INC.
Defendant:
CRRC CORPORATION, LTD., doing business as China Railway Rolling Stock Corporation
SNF S.A. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
as 24-1931
Appellant:
SNF S.A.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
Noakes v. L'Oreal U.S.A., Inc.
as NYS/1:24-CV-02735
Plaintiff:
Noakes and Ciara Noakes
Defendant:
L'Oreal U.S.A., Inc.
Lear Corporation et al v. Prevent U.S.A. Corporation
as 2:2024mc00009
Petitioner:
Adient US LLC and Lear Corporation
Respondent:
Prevent U.S.A. Corporation
S.G. v. Bank of China Ltd.
as 24-1426
Plaintiff:
S.G., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and M.G., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant:
BANK OF CHINA U.S.A., BOC INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD, BOCI COMMODITIES & FUTURES (USA) LLC and others
Teron v. Alchemee, LLC et al
as CAN/5:24-CV-01918
Plaintiff:
Teron, George Teron, Efren Ramos and others
Defendant:
Alchemee, LLC and Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
