Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Elizabeth Nesbitt, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 14-36049
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS BOSTICK, Lieutenant General, Commanding General and Chief Engineers, ANDREW D. KELLY, Lieutenant Colonel, Walla Walla District Comander and District Engineer and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH E. NESBITT, FKA Elizabeth Morris and ALAN C. BAKER
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC. and CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION
Ridout et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-23840
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth E. Ridout and Robert S. Ridout
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Crockett v. Mutual of Omaha Bank et al
as 3:2012cv00337
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth E. Crockett
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Bank , M&T Bank Corporation, HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
