Cases 21 - 30 of 69
United States of America v. Velez (Rodriguez)
as 21-2032
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carmelo Velez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Luis Sepulveda, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Angel Lopez, AKA Sealed Defendant 4 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Rodriguez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2
United States of America v. Velez (Gonzalez)
as 21-1908
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carmelo Velez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Christopher Rodriguez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Luis Sepulveda, AKA Sealed Defendant 3 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Gonzalez, AKA Sealed Defendant 17
United States of America v. Velez (Angel Lopez)
as 21-648
Defendant:
Luis Sepulveda, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Emmanuel Bonafe, AKA Sealed Defendant 6, Christopher Lum, AKA Sealed Defendant 5 and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Angel Lopez, AKA Sealed Defendant 4
Angel Lopez-Santiago v. William Barr
as 20-72095
Petitioner:
ANGEL LOPEZ-SANTIAGO, AKA Sergio Hernandez-Ruiz, AKA Angel Santiago Lopez
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Luis LopezIn re: Luis Lopez
as 20-11957
Petitioner:
In re: LUIS ANGEL LOPEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Angel-Lopez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 20-10116
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
JOSE CARLOS ANGEL-LOPEZ
Miguel Lopez-Castanon v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60850
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ-CASTANON
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Miguel Lopez-Mendoza v. William Barr
as 19-56233
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ-MENDOZA
USA v. Jesus Lopez
as 19-50150
Defendant / Appellant:
JESUS ANGEL LOPEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Lopez-Silva
as 2:2018mj30350
Defendant:
Luis Angel Lopez-Silva
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
