Cases 21 - 30 of 44
USA v. Evola Brent
as 17-50241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EVOLA LOWRY BRENT, also known as "C.C"
West Virginia CWP Fund v. DOWCP
as 16-1923
Petitioner:
WEST VIRGINIA CWP FUND, as carrier for C.C. Conley & Sons, Inc.
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and DOYLE G. BAILES
Federal Trade Commission v. Denny Lake et al
as 8:2015cv00585
Defendant:
Chad Caldaronello, Derek Nelson, Brian Pacios and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
McNamara Benjamin LLP
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard J McNeil
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
A.Z. v. C.C. et al
as 1:2014cv05772
Plaintiff:
A.Z.
Defendant:
C.C. et al
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Baker Hughes Oilfield Oprt Inc v. Carlos Torres, et al
as 14-10768
Debtor:
In the Matter of: R. L. ADKINS CORPORATION
Appellant:
BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, INCORPORATED
Appellee:
CARLOS A. TORRES, BLACK COLUMBIA PARTNERS, L.L.C., COWBOYS RESOURCES CORPORATION and others
Fortino Sanchez v. State of Nevada, et al
as 13-72618
Petitioner:
FORTINO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
STATE OF NEVADA, ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and C.C. MESTO
US v. William Lassiter, Jr.
as 13-4543
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEON LASSITER, JR., a/k/a C.C.
Tevis Ignacio, et al v. Safeway, Inc., et al
as 12-16702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEVIS R. IGNACIO, AKA Robin Hood, MINOR N.S. and MOTHER C.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
SAFEWAY, INC. and RETAIL STORES
Morris v. C.C. Moore & Co. Engineers, et al
as CAN/3:12-CV-02790
Plaintiff:
Morris
Defendant:
C.C. Moore & Co. Engineers
Minor N.S. et al v. Safeway, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01989
Plaintiff:
Minor N.S. and Mother C.C.
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc. and Retail Stores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
