Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,921
DIAZ v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as PAE/2:24-cv-03318
Defendant: NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff: TABBY DIAZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04081
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Carranza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4479
Petitioner: SEBASTIAN CARRANZA HERNANDEZ, CLAUDIA P HERRERA DIAZ, ALEJANDRO CARRANZA HERRERA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Herrera, et al. v. City of Palmdale, et al.
as 24-4489
Defendant: Palmdale Officer BLAKELY, individual and official capacity, JAMES PURTEE, individual and official capacity, NARDY LOPEZ, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff: WILLIAM RYAN HERRERA, WILLIAM ROBERT HERRERA, Individually and on behalf of their minor child N. P. H., MONA MOLINA HERRERA, Individually and on behalf of their minor child N. P. H. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Diaz Morales (Orlando Hernandez)
as 24-1891
Defendant: MAURICIO HERNANDEZ PINEDA, RONALD ENRIQUE SALGUERO PORTILLO, Ronald Salguero and others
: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Diaz-Irizarry
as 24-1641
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: NATANAEL DIAZ-IRIZARRY
United States v. Edwin Diaz
as 24-2438
Defendant: Edwin Edgardo Diaz
Plaintiff: United States of America
Noriega Diaz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4263
Petitioner: BRANDON BARRAGAN NORIEGA, NALLELY NORIEGA DIAZ and CESAR BARRAGAN NORIEGA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?