Other Statutes Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
WARWICK v. COUNTRY CHOICE, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00804
Defendant: COUNTRY CHOICE, INC., RANDALL JOHNSON and CRAIG C. WALKER
Plaintiff: GEORGE WARWICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Srivastava v. Payne et al
as 2:2011mc00025
Plaintiff: Carolyn Herz Srivastava
Defendant: James Payne , Mitchell Daniels , Randall Shepard and others
MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS USA, INC. v. ASTROCOSMOS METALLURGICAL, INC. et al
as 3:2011mc00005
Defendant: ASTROCOSMOS METALLURGICAL, INC. and CARBONE LORRAINE EQUIPMENTS GENIE CHIMIQUE
Material Witne: Randall J. Hart
Plaintiff: MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS USA, INC.
IN RE: DIGGINS
as 1:2010mc00111
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2010mc00069
Respondent: TIMOTHY PAUL ALCORN, PAUL NEJAT ALP, DANIEL BAXTER WANN ALTMAN and others
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Adkins et al v. Will et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00510
Plaintiff: Jerry Adkins, Coralie J Anderson, Bill Barber and others
Cause Of Action: Comprehensive Env Response, Compensation & Liability Act
SHEPHERD et al v. BP OIL PIPELINE COMPANY
as 1:2008cv00333
Plaintiff: RANDALL K. SHEPHERD and CHERYL SHEPHERD
Defendant: BP OIL PIPELINE COMPANY and BP OIL PIPELINE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00851
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
IN THE MATTER OF THE NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
as 1:2007mc00080
Respondent: JOHN A. ADAMS, JR., JAMES A. ADKINS, DOUGLAS DAVID ANDERSON and others
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS
as 1:2007mc00081
Respondent: DOUGLAS CHARLES AMBERGER, JENNIFER JONES AUGER, DAVID JOHN BACHMAN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?