Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00626
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BEO Bancorp v. Columbia River Bank et al
as 3:2010cv01561
Plaintiff:
BEO Bancorp
Defendant:
Robert V. Card, Roger L. Christensen, Terry L. Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Harrison v. Lange Trucking, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00322
Defendant:
Steve Bailey, Lange Trucking, Inc., Robert Langenhuizen and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Construction Equipment Company et al v. Powerscreen International PLC et al
as 3:1996cv01574
Plaintiff:
Construction Equipment Company and Roger G Smith
Defendant:
Powerscreen International Distribution, Ltd., Powerscreen International PLC, Powerscreen of America Inc. and others
503) 227-5839 (fax:
Jeff S. Pitzer, Jeff S. Pitzer, Jeff S. Pitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Giacomini v. West Coast Bank et al
as 6:2008cv06333
Plaintiff:
Larisa Y. Giacomini
Defendant:
West Coast Bank, West Coast Bank, Aspen Tree Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
United States of America v. Updegrave
as 3:2008mc09219
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Roger J. Updegrave
United States of America v. Updegrave
as 3:2008mc09218
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Roger J. Updegrave
United States of America v. Updegrave
as 3:2008mc09199
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Roger J. Updegrave
Tabb v. MYICIS et al
as 3:2007cv00302
Plaintiff:
Roger L Tabb
Defendant:
MYICIS, Wayne Hicks and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
