Cases 21 - 30 of 77
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2020cv01535
Defendant:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Wendy Carrizal v. Megan Brennan
as 20-50333
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General of the U.S. Postal Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDY CARRIZAL
DRAZDIK V DIRECTOR INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ET AL
as 2:2020cv00549
Plaintiff:
ANDREW STEPHEN DRAZDIK, JR.
Defendant:
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, PENNSYLVANIA STATE BUREAU, DIRECTOR INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
James Lohnes v. Megan Brennan, et al
as 20-1077
Defendant / Appellee:
S. WOODS, U.S. Postal Service, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General and S. FOLSON, U.S. Postal Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES A. LOHNES
Carpezzi v. United States of America - U.S. Postal Service et al
as 2:2020cv00005
Defendant:
United States of America - U.S. Postal Service and U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Carpezzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Labor Relations Board v. U.S. Postal Service
as 19-14617
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Barnhart v. Horn
as 2:2019cv04275
Petitioner:
U.S. Postal Service and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Terri Barnhart
Defendant:
Michael L. Horn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ledin v. U.S. Postal Service, Jackson County, Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Ledin
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Jackson County, Missouri and U.S. Postal Service, Johnson County, Kansas
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Fox v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 2:2018cv10901
Plaintiff:
Cherunda Lynn Fox
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service and Unnamed Postal Employees
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
