Cases 31 - 40 of 14,099
Charles G. Berwind Trust, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-2360
Petitioner:
TRUST UNDER THE TRUST OF CHARLES G. BERWIND TRUST, F/B/O David M. Berwind, Jr., Valerie L. Pawson, D. Michael Berwind, Jr., David M. Berwind III and Richard D.R. Berwind, Trustees, TRUST UNDER THE TRUST OF CHARLES G. BERWIND TRUST, F/B/O Linda Berwind Shappy, Linda Berwind Shappy, Russsell F. Shappy, Jr., and Dennis R. Delaney, Trustees and TRUST UNDER THE TRUST OF CHARLES G. BERWIND TRUST, F/B/O Gail Berwind Warden, Gail Berwind Warden, Duncan C. Warden and Dennis R. Delaney, Trustees, all as successor trusts to the Charles G. Berwind Trust
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Duncan Warden, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-2361
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner:
GAIL WARDEN and DUNCAN WARDEN
Siavosh HenarehIn re: Siavosh Henareh
as 24-2401
Petitioner:
In re: SIAVOSH HENAREH
Respondent:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI MEDIUM and CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Estate of David M. Berwind, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-2363
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner:
ESTATE OF DAVID M. BERWIND, Deceased, David McMichael Berwind, Jr., Linda Berwind Shappy & Gail Berwind Warden, Personal Representatives and ESTATE OF JEANNE BERWIND, Deceased, Linda Berwind Shappy & Gail Berwind Warden, Co-Personal Representative
John GreenIn re: John Green
as 24-1638
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN T. GREEN
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Brooks v. Lee, et al.
as 24-4653
Defendant:
S. BEASLEY, E. ARNOLD, Warden, S. LEE, Correctional Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROOKS
Jerry HeflinIn re: Jerry Heflin
as 24-3652
Respondent:
KENNETH BLACK, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: JERRY JERMAINE HEFLIN
In re: Preston Taylor
as 24-12426
Respondent:
THE STATE OF ALABAMA and WARDEN
Petitioner:
In re: PRESTON JEROME TAYLOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
