Cases 61 - 70 of 5,506
Calderon Lopez v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transport Authority, et al.
as 24-3717
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT AUTHORITY and CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
Robert Davis v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1327
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, ALISHA BELL, Chairperson/Chairwomen of the Wayne County Board of Commissioners, TIMOTHY JOHNSON, Owner of Gaukler Pointe Communications, LLC and others
Laquita Oliver v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 24-188
Petitioner:
LAQUITA OLIVER, CHERELLE JACOB, ANDRE ROBINSON and others
Respondent:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gustafson-Feis, et al. v. Mayo, et al.
as 24-3686
Plaintiff:
LISA GUSTAFSON-FEIS and JULIEN FEIS
Defendant:
KEITH MAYO, Doctor, SWEDISH FIRST HILL, CHRISTOPHER BOONE, Doctor and others
Hernandez v. Russell, et al.
as 24-3672
Plaintiff:
FRANK MANUEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
PERRY RUSSELL, Warden, RON SCHRECKENGOST, Assistant Warden WSCC, BRIANA HILL, Grievance Report/Assistant and others
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Town of Chapel Hill, Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.
Defendant:
Town of Chapel Hill, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Samuel Hill v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:24-cv-03466
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
