Cases 61 - 70 of 916
Stein v. Benefitfocus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10358
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Benefitfocus, Inc., Doug A. Dennerline, Matt Levin and others
Marvin Garcia v. U.S. Attorney General
as 22-14013
Petitioner:
MARVIN LEVIN GARCIA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
James v. Well Life Network Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv07469
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Allan James
Defendant:
Well Life Network Incorporated, The State University of New York and Jaclyn Levine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Henry v. Coughlan et al
as 3:2022cv03239
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Coughlan, Timothy C. Evans, Judge Sophia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Joseph Levin
as 22-13773
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH LUIS LEVIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sara DeRosa v. Paramount Global, et al
as 22-80121
Respondent:
SARA DEROSA, Individually, and On Behalf of others similarly situated
Petitioner:
PARAMOUNT GLOBAL, FKA ViacomCBS Inc., CBS TELEVISION STUDIOS, A Division of CBS Studios, Inc., SESSIONS PAYROLL MANAGEMENT INC. and others
In re: MINTZ, LEVIN, COHEN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY & POPEO, P.C.
as 2:2022mc01366
In Re:
MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY & POPEO, P.C.
Respondent:
Thomas E Reynolds
Hardie's Fruit & Vegetable Co LP et al v. Ponder Foods LLC et al
as 3:2022cv02306
Plaintiff:
Hardie's Fruit & Vegetable Co LP and Hardies Fruit and Vegetable Company-South LP
Defendant:
Ponder Foods LLC, Benjamin H. Ponder, Amy B Ponder and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Zarlenga et al v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2022cv00372
Defendant:
Thrive Behavioral Health Center, Inc, United States Of America, George W. Bush and others
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Zarlenga and Victoria A. Zarlenga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
