Cases 61 - 70 of 595
CICCOTELLI v. VEREIT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02983
Defendant:
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION, EUGENE A PINOVER, RICHARD LIEB and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. CONSTELLATION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02970
Defendant:
MORPHOSYS AG, CONSTELLATION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ELIZABETH G TREHU and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. PROOFPOINT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02733
Defendant:
JONATHAN FEIBER, DANA EVAN, KEVIN HARVEY and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02488
Defendant:
ELLEN KESZLER, JODIE W MCLEAN, THOMAS F O'TOOLE and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
TATE v. PEOPLE'S UNITED FINANCIAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02030
Defendant:
PEOPLE'S UNITED FINANCIAL, INC., JERRY FRANKLIN, JANE CHWICK and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN TATE
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. AEGION CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv01914
Defendant:
AEGION CORPORATION, WALTER J GALVIN, STEPHEN P CORTINOVIS and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
REDFIELD v. FBL FINANCIAL INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01795
Defendant:
CRAIG D HILL, PAUL E LARSON, ROGER K BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL A JUFFER and DENISE REDFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. TCF FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv01205
Defendant:
DAVID T PROVOST, ARTHUR A WEISS, VANCE K OPPERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
LAZAR et al v. SINGER et al
as 2:2021cv01055
Defendant:
BRUCE H SINGER, LYNNE SPIVACK and LAJ ELITE HOMES LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED VETERANS ROOFING and RICHARD LAZAR
CICCOTELLI v. HMS HOLDINGS CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv01027
Defendant:
BART M SCHWARTZ, BILL LUCIA, CORA M TELLEZ and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
