Cases 71 - 80 of 98
Rickey Louis Alford v. Barack Obama et al
as 2:2009cv07776
Plaintiff:
Rickey Louis Alford
Defendant:
Barack Obama, F. B. Haws, Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Rickey Louis Alford v. F. B. Haws et al
as 2:2009cv07564
Petitioner:
Rickey Louis Alford
Respondent:
Arnold Schwarzenegger and F. B. Haws
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vita Food Products, Inc.
as 1:2009cv06152
Plaintiff:
Vita Food Products, Inc., Stephen D Rubin, John Seramur and others
Defendant:
Howard E Bedford, Clifford K Bolen, David S Lipson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eddie James Otis Atkins v. F. B. Haws et al
as 2:2009cv06640
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Otis Atkins
Defendant:
F. B. Haws, Jessica Buendia, Jeffery Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Dallan Louis v. F.B. Haws
as 2:2009cv06442
Petitioner:
Dallan Louis
Respondent:
F. B. Haws
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ernest Napper, Jr. v. F. B. Haws, et al
as 09-56392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST NAPPER, Jr.
Defendant:
F. B. HAWS, Warden, official capacity, WOFFORD, Associate Warden, individual & official capacity, R. NIPPER, Associate Warden, individual & official capacity and others
Demarious Dewayne Gaines v. F.B. Haws
as 2:2009cv06210
Petitioner:
Demarious Dewayne Gaines
Respondent:
F. B. Haws
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reginald B. DeJohnette v. F. B. Halls
as 2:2009cv06100
Petitioner:
Reginald B. DeJohnette
Respondent:
F. B. Halls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
