Cases 71 - 80 of 177
Robinson et al v. Dunlap et al
as 1:2014cv02563
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn I. Robinson and Andrew A. Robinson
Defendant:
Harley E. Dunlap and Geico Insurance Company
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ANS Food Market v. United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
as 1:2014cv02071
Plaintiff:
ANS Food Market
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Cofield v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2014cv01719
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield
Defendant:
United States Attorney General , United States Attorney's Office , United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Doe v. United States of America
as 8:2014cv01441
Plaintiff:
Pylord P. Doe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 8:2014cv00996
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Rios
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cofield v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield
Defendant:
Corizon Inc. , Eric H. Holder, Jr. , General Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Watkins v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv03838
Petitioner:
Renault Watkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Stewart v. United States of America
as 8:2013cv03610
Plaintiff:
Reginald B. Stewart
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Branch-Williams v. United States of America
as 8:2013cv03393
Plaintiff:
Joyce Branch-Williams
Defendant:
United States of |America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Washburn v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv02954
Petitioner:
Terri Washburn
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
