Cases 81 - 90 of 138
DAVIS v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv01016
Plaintiff:
ROSALIND DAVIS and HARRY DAVIS
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2012cv06993
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, JOSHUA RINGGOLD INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A REUBEN'S MARC A/K/A VILLAGE BAR and CHRISTOPHER MARC HOLDINGS, INC. AN UNKNOWN BUSINESS ENTITY D/B/A REUBEN'S MARC A/K/A VILLAGE BAR
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
DAVIS v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2012cv05943
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv03747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BROWN v. BENGAL CONVERTING SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv02970
Intervenor:
THEO DAVIS MANN
Plaintiff:
JOHN BROWN
Defendant:
BENGAL CONVERTING SERVICES, INC. , YORK PAPER COMPANY, INC. , BENGAL CONVERTING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
