Cases 81 - 90 of 92
Elliott v. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2009mc80042
Plaintiff:
Vance S. Elliott
Defendant:
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors and The San Francisco Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board
Elliott v. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2009mc80038
Plaintiff:
Vance S. Elliott
Defendant:
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors and The San Francisco Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board
Elliott v. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2009mc80040
Plaintiff:
Vance S. Elliott
Defendant:
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors and The San Francisco Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board
Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. et al v. County of San Luis Obispo et al
as 8:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C., Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C., Ed Harden and others
Defendant:
County of San Luis Obispo, Board of Supervisors for the County of San Luis Obispo, Harry Ovitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
City of Santa Clarita v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2004cv07355
Defendant:
Cemex Inc, County of Los Angeles, Does and others
Plaintiff:
City of Santa Clarita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Swoopes v. Bank of America Risk Management Department et al
as 3:2008cv04369
Plaintiff:
Cloteal Swoopes
Defendant:
Bank of America Risk Management Department, Joanna Guzman, Steve Owens and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
-PJW Gary Harris, et al v. Board of Supervisors, et al
as 2:2003cv02008
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, Diana Bonta, Gray Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Medhat Elsadoni, Susan Haggerty, Gary Harris, - and others
Unknown:
Sonal Shashikant Ambegaokar, Sonal Shashikant Ambegaokar, Sonal Shashikant Ambegaokar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Sprint Spectrum Realty Company L.P. et al
as 4:2008cv00342
Plaintiff:
Sprint Spectrum L.P. and Sprint Spectrum Realty Company L.P.
Defendant:
County of San Mateo, Board of Supervisors for the County of San Mateo, Mark Church and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Elliott v. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors
as 3:2007mc80258
Plaintiff:
Vance S. Elliott
Defendant:
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors
Dexter S C Farlough v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
as 2:2007cv06244
Plaintiff:
Dexter S C Farlough
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
