Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS, FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Williams v. Office of the United States Trustee, et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Hosea M Williams and Hosea M. Williams
Defendant:
Peter J. Barrett, LeClair Ryan, P.C., Office of the United States Trustee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
PRINGLE et al v. FREY et al
as 1:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
JANE P PRINGLE, KENNETH FLETCHER, BONNIE S GOULD and others
Defendant:
AARON FREY, MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VERSANT POWER et al v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER and ENMAX CORPORATION
Defendant:
WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Petitioner:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Petitioner:
FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION et al v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al
as 1:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and MAINE ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burrell v. Central New York Psychiatric Center
as 23-7260
Defendant / Appellee:
J. LAVALLEY, Employee of CNYPC, CLEVELAND, Employee of CNYPC, D. MCINTOSH, Superintendent of CCF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
CENTRAL NEW YORK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER and A. FRENYA, Deputy of Security of CCF
Burrell v. Durkin
as 23-6689
Appellee:
MARY BETH GILLEN, Nurse; Clinton Correctional Facility, CHARLIE DURKIN, Lieutenant; Clinton Correctional Facility, KING, Sergeant; Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Appellant:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
JANQUISH, Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, JOHN DOE 1, Inmate; Clinton Correctional Facility, JOHN DOE 2, Inmate; Clinton Correctional Facility and others
LeClair v. Vinson
as 21-1646
Plaintiff:
Minors I.L. and S.L.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nicholas J. LeClair
Defendant / Appellee:
Sarah Raymond, in her individual capacity, Tammy Breen, in her individual capacity, County of Warren, inclusive and others
Defendant:
Jessica Vinson, in her individual capacity, Danielle Colon, in her individual capacity, Doe 1, Incluside and others
Vincent v. Yelich
as 21-22
Defendant:
Robert Dennison, Bare Hill Correctional Facility, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Defendant's in their official and unofficial capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shawn Michael Vincent
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony J. Annucci
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
