Cases 1 - 9 of 9
American National Insurance Company v. Carroll et al
as 8:2022cv03304
Plaintiff:
American National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Anna D. Carroll and Rose Marie Carroll
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stephen C., et al v. Bureau of Indian Education, et al
as 21-15097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DURELL P., a minor, by and through Billie P., guardian ad litem, OLAF D., LEVI R., a minor, by and through Laila R., guardian ad litem and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION, JEFF WILLIAMSON, LAWRENCE ROBERTS, in his official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01965
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnny Partain v. City of South Padre Island, et al
as 19-40197
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS W. STAHL, ANNA D. STAHL, CITY OF SOUTH PADRE ISLAND, TEXAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY PARTAIN
Arnold et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01345
Plaintiff:
Paul H. Arnold , Theodore R Babcock , Connie R Babcock and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
VOELKER v. LEADING EDGE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 2:2011cv01352
Plaintiff:
ANNA D. VOELKER
Defendant:
LEADING EDGE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
