Cases 1 - 10 of 790
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Huaman
as 5:2024cv06103
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Sergio Robles Huaman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
State of Texas et al v. Becerra et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Carmen Robles Frost and State of Texas
Defendant:
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, United States of America, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Yablonsky v. Alford, et al.
as 24-4915
Defendant:
MRS. TICSCARNIA, ANDERSON, Associate Warden, MRS. MCGUIRE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN HENRY YABLONSKY
Dai et al v. SAS Institute Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02537
Plaintiff:
Hanson Dai, Max Chiswick, Adolph Robles and others
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc., Ideas Inc., Choice Hotels International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hernandez-Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3704
Petitioner:
JOSE DAVID HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ, EVA SARAI GALO-ROBLES, KEREN NICOLE HERNANDEZ-GALO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: Naturalization Ceremony 06/25/24
as 3:2024mc80145
Unknown:
Krishna Kumar Yerur, Ferdinand Carbonell Malimban, Teodoro Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Miguel Robles Corcuera v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1963
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL ROBLES CORCUERA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Robles
as 24-2809
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RICARDO ROBLES
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
