Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Jaimes v. Assurant, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv08062
Plaintiff:
Maykelin Jaimes
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Assurant, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walker Products Inc. v. Cong et al
as 2:2024mc00373
Defendant:
Yue (Frank) Cong and All Automotive Megahub, Inc.
Cross-Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Walker Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Walker Products Inc. v. Cong et al
as 2:2024at01192
Cross-Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Defendant:
All Automotive Megahub, Inc. and Yue (Frank) Cong
Plaintiff:
Walker Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Morvarid Emamy v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Morvarid Emamy
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jesus Marcos v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jesus Marcos
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Marcos v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jesus Marcos
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Nair v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 3:2022cv08030
Plaintiff:
SEEMA NAIR
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Clements v. T-Mobile USA, Inc et al
as 5:2022cv07512
Petitioner:
Bradford Arthur Clements
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc and T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bang Huynh v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01537
Plaintiff:
Bang Huynh
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc. and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
