Cases 91 - 100 of 239
Donahue et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2013cv10205
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
James Donahue and Sandra Leighton- Donahue
Brady v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah J. Brady
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , Federal National Mortgage Association , The Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Trombley v. Seterus, Inc., et al
as 2:2012cv15675
Plaintiff:
Carolyn A. Trombley
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Shamoun v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2012cv15608
Plaintiff:
Sama Shamoun
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and Chase Manhatten Mortgage Corporation
Totten et al v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv15029
Plaintiff:
Carol A Totten and Steven W Totten
Defendant:
Green Tree Servicing, LLC and Fannie Mae, a/k/a Federal National Mortgage Association
Visingardi v. Federal National Mortgage Association
as 2:2012cv14974
Plaintiff:
Ginger Visingardi
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Cloos et al v. One West Bank et al
as 2:2012cv14956
Plaintiff:
Michael Cloos and Cheryl Cloos
Defendant:
One West Bank and Federal National Mortgage Association
Johnson et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association
as 2:2012cv14710
Plaintiff:
Nikisha Johnson and Georgia Johnson
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Coach v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv14646
Plaintiff:
Michael Coach
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , Federal National Mortgage Association, Fannie Mae Remic Trust 2003-86 and others
Mastalski et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv14407
Plaintiff:
Donna Mastalski and Philip Mastalski
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
