Cases 91 - 100 of 297
v. Cook et al
as 1:2016at00226
Defendant:
Charles Ace Cook, Jr, City of California, A California Municipal Corporation, Tom William Weil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KMART CORPORATION v. RAVEN ASSOCIATES - TOMS RIVER et al
as 3:2016cv01404
Plaintiff:
KMART CORPORATION
Defendant:
RAVEN ASSOCIATES - TOMS RIVER and AEGIS INVESTMENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boykin v. Litton Loan Servicing et al
as 1:2016cv01037
Plaintiff:
Annie M Boykin
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing and Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
Miscellaneou:
Tom TJ Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Benafel v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 6:2016cv00273
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Benafel
Defendant:
George Brown, City of Eugene, Mike Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2015cv00984
Plaintiff:
Tom Anderson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA and Arnold Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2015cv00939
Plaintiff:
Tom Anderson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson, as Trustee for Kerry Trust v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 4:2015cv00938
Plaintiff:
Tom Anderson, as Trustee for Kerry Trust
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
8919 Sunset Blvd., LLC v. Tom Vuong et al
as 2:2015cv08769
Plaintiff:
8919 Sunset Blvd., LLC
Defendant:
Does and Tom Vuong
BBCN Bank v. Suh et al
as 1:2015cv09621
Plaintiff:
BBCN Bank
Defendant:
Tom Chong Il Suh, Sook Suh, Dandi, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Park Street Group, LLC v. White et al
as 5:2015cv02015
Plaintiff:
Park Street Group, LLC
Defendant:
Reanna A. White and Tony Taylor, Jr.
3rd_pty_defendant:
Tom M. Reaves, National Asset Advisors, Lana Sellers and others
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Tony Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
