Torts - Injury Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Meyers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05882
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Earnestine Y Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romero v. DePuy Orthopaedic Inc. et al
as 1:2020dp20129
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Services, DePuy Orthopaedic Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff: Andrew Y. Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christoff v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00854
Plaintiff: Paulette Y. Christoff
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Pearson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv01121
Plaintiff: Maggae Jo Jackson
Defendant: Judge Benita Y. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Stewart v. DePuy Orthopedics Inc et al
as 1:2016dp20072
Plaintiff: Patricia Y. Stewart
Defendant: DePuy Orthopedics Inc , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
H.Y.. et al. v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02247
Plaintiff: H. Y. and Laurie Young
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02248
Plaintiff: Vera Y. Smith
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
E.Y., et al. v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01017
Plaintiff: E. Y. and Kim Yabs
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swatzel v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00908
Plaintiff: Amy Y. Swatzel
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riegle v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20602
Plaintiff: Karen Y Riegle
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?