Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Elizondo et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv03062
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Julia A Elizondo and Victor H Elizondo
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elizondo Serna v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 7:2015cv00512
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Plaintiff:
Silvia Antonia Elizondo Serna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Trevino v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Elizondo Trevino
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and Murphy Oil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elizondo v. Keppel Amfels L.L.C.
as 1:2014cv00220
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Elizondo
Defendant:
Keppel Amfels L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Elizondo et al v. Pearson et al
as 5:2013cv00058
Plaintiff:
Vidal Elizondo and Patricia S Elizondo
Defendant:
Daniel Neil Pearson and C.R. England, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Elizondo v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
as 1:2009cv00443
Plaintiff:
Charley Elizondo
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elizondo v. Amigos Meat Distributors, L.P.
as 4:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
Mario Elizondo
Defendant:
Amigos Meat Distributors, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mendoza v. Unknown Named U.S. Marshals, et al
as 7:2007cv00269
Plaintiff:
Maria Mendoza, Maria Mendoza and Maria Mendoza
Defendant:
Unknown Named U.S. Marshals of U.S. Marshals Service of the Southern District of Texas, Individually, Joe Magallan, Unknown Named Officers of the United States Drug Enforcement Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
