Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Cuevas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01354
Plaintiff:
Cinthia Cuevas , Honelia Enriquez , Kimberly Gerber and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cuevas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00498
Plaintiff:
Cinthia Cuevas , Honelia Enriquez , Kimberly Gerber and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alain Padron v. Marazul Charters, Inc., et al
as 16-12391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAIN GUERRA PADRON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARAZUL CHARTERS, INC. and ARMANDO GARCIA
Padron v. Marazul Charters Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv24539
Plaintiff:
Alain Guerra Padron
Defendant:
Marazul Charters Inc. and Armando Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Padron v. Dye Precision, Inc.
as 8:2015cv02471
Plaintiff:
Rojelio Padron
Defendant:
Dye Precision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Padron v. Dye Precision, Inc.
as 6:2015cv01599
Plaintiff:
Rojelio Padron
Defendant:
Dye Precision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Padron et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32819
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Padron and Antonio Padron
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arredondo-Padron v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv26693
Plaintiff:
Felicitas Arredondo-Padron
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drozd et al v. Padron et al
as 3:2013cv02523
Plaintiff:
Linda Drozd and Michael Drozd
Defendant:
John M Padron and Thomas Variale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padron v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv10799
Plaintiff:
Ashley Padron
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
