Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Brown et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Richard Laverne Brown , Jacqueline G. Hill , Delphine Murray Williams and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bistritz v. Sykes, et al
as 4:2014cv00183
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Bistritz
Defendant:
Neel Lee Sykes and Atlantic Coast Marine Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1292
DANIELS v. DEPART OF THE ARMY et al
as 1:2014cv00728
Plaintiff:
ALTHEA ALLEN DANIELS
Defendant:
DEPART OF THE ARMY, ANTONIO MATTHEW JASINSKI and JAMES A. LUEVANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Johnston v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
Timothy Matthew Johnston
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy, Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Charles Francis Johnson and Robin Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Matthew Thomas King and Mark Jamalian King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Matthews v. Horizon Marketing and Research, LLC
as 3:2012cv00825
Plaintiff:
Diane Matthews
Defendant:
Horizon Marketing and Research, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Welch v. Lapoint et al
as 4:2012cv00116
Plaintiff:
Penny Holton Welch
Defendant:
Eric Matthew Lapoint and PSC Industrial Outsourcing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mc Menamin v. Southerland et al
as 5:2010cv00503
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mc Menamin
Defendant:
Regina Southerland and Wilcox, Mc Fayden, Fields & Southerland Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FREE et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2010cv00867
Plaintiff:
KATRENA FREE , BEVERLY PAYLOR , MICHELE ELOVER and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILD, et al v. PFIZER INC.
as 1:2010cv00461
Plaintiff:
RACHEL WILD and MATTHEW YATES
Defendant:
PFIZER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
