Cases 61 - 70 of 103
Agyapong et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06576
Plaintiff:
Kwaku Agyapong , Douglas Antley , Raymond Austin and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06490
Plaintiff:
Billy Carroll Adams , Clinton L. Brackley, Jr. , Rita Brooks and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harlow v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11470
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harlow
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harlow et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11504
Plaintiff:
Rhonda S. Harlow and Todd R. Harlow
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willis v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01938
Plaintiff:
Harlow Willis
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARLOW v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00688
Plaintiff:
JACK H HARLOW
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc and Abbott Laboratories Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harlow v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00524
Plaintiff:
Jack Harlow
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc. and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willis v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Harlow Willis
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harlow v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02058
Plaintiff:
Angela Sue Harlow
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harlow v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv26604
Plaintiff:
Angela Sue Harlow
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
