Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ESTATE OF AYELET ARNIN et al v. DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA
as 1:2024cv02093
Plaintiff:
R.S., ESTATE OF AVRAHAM HANKIN, YAFFA HANKIN and others
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
JAMES-IRVIN v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff:
KEITA M JAMES-IRVIN and KEITA M. JAMES-IRVIN
Defendant:
1017 Records, STACY ABRAMS, ASCAP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
ESTATE OF ARI YOEL FULD et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2020cv03492
Plaintiff:
ELIEZER YAKIR FULD, TAMAR GILA FULD, MIRIAM FULD and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
STEINBERG et al v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN
as 1:2020cv02996
Plaintiff:
DANIEL YAAKOV FULD, ADERET RIVKAH HENKIN, HARVEY JONAS YONAH FULD and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
BAXTER et al v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC et al
as 1:2018cv01078
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACK BAXTER , FRAN STRAUSS BAXTER , ESTATE OF DAVID APPLEBAUM and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC and SYRIAN AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
WULTZ et al v. BANK OF CHINA LIMITED
as 1:2013mc01248
Intervenor:
RIVKA MARTHA MORIAH , NAFTALI ANDREW MOSES , DAVID MORIAH and others
Plaintiff:
SHERYL WULTZ , YEKUTIEL WULTZ , AMANDA WULTZ and others
Defendant:
BANK OF CHINA LIMITED
Cause Of Action: Motion to Intervene
BAXTER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2011cv02133
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACK BAXTER , FRAN STRAUSS BAXTER, ESTATE OF DAVID APPLEBAUM and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN , IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY , SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
LATHAM v. CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv01852
Plaintiff:
EMILY C. LATHAM
Defendant:
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA, ARIE DINKELOO, JOSEPH NEMECZ and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
