Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Amalgamated Union Local 450-A Welfare Fund et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07520
Plaintiff:
Amalgamated Union Local 450-A Welfare Fund, AFL-CIO Local 475 Health and Welfare Fund, Allied Security Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company Inc., McKinsey & Company Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company Inc. Washington D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Amalgamated Union Local 450-A Welfare Fund et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06789
Plaintiff:
Amalgamated Union Local 450-A Welfare Fund, AFL-CIO Local 475 Health and Welfare Fund, Allied Security Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
NOITU Insurance Trust Fund v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45808
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Walgreen Co, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
NOITU Insurance Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOITU Insurance Trust Fund v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv04958
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
NOITU Insurance Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maldonado, et al v. Damas Foundation, Inc., et al
as 16-1550
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLGA MALDONADO, in representation of her minor son J.N.D. and JOSUED NARVAEZ-MALDONADO
Defendant - Appellee:
DAMAS FOUNDATION, INC., as Settlor of Damas Self Insurance Trust Fund, a/k/a Hospital Damas Self Insurance Trust Fund, WALDEMAR DEL VALLE-ARMSTRONG, current member of the Board of Directors of Damas Foundation, Inc., JOSE HECTOR VIVAS-PIETRI, current member of the Board of Directors of Damas Foundation, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
HOSPITAL DAMAS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
