Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Ponder v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 6:2024cv01657
Plaintiff:
Robert Ponder
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ponder v. Orsini
as 2:2024cv03742
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
Kisha Orsini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ponder v. Murphy
as 2:2024cv03743
Defendant:
Matthew Murphy
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ponder v. Selhorst
as 2:2024cv03744
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
James Selhorst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ponder v. Walker
as 2:2024cv03746
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
Zachary A. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ponder v. Columbus Police Department
as 2:2024cv03747
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
Columbus Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ponder v. US Attorney et al
as 4:2024cv04243
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons at the Western Regional Office in Dublin, California, US Attorney General and US Attorney
Plaintiff:
Ms. Evie Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Ponder et al v. RFS Group, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv04600
Defendant:
RFS Group, Inc. and David Pluidze
Plaintiff:
Shannon Ponder and Aaron Leffler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ponder v. Fire Insurance Company, The
as 6:2024cv01088
Defendant:
Standard Fire Insurance Company, The
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
PONDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33580
Plaintiff:
RYAN PONDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
