Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Supersonic Drying Technologies, B.V. et al v. Impact Emerging Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Arie C Bos, Supersonic Drying Technologies, BV, Supersonic Drying Technologies, B.V. and others
Defendant:
Impact Emerging Technologies, LLC (IET), James Eugene Sablich, Jr., Andrew A Orso and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Miller et al v. City of Leland et al
as 4:2018cv00254
Plaintiff:
Clara Jones, Pearlie Smith, Miranda Carter and others
Defendant:
Defendants A-D, City of Leland, Mayor Kenny Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McHenry et al v. IS, LLC and/or Intellisystem, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
McHenry, William B. McHenry, Jr. Individually and d/b/a Ascension Medical Supply, LLC and First South Investments, LLC
Defendant:
IS, LLC and/or Intellisystem, LLC, Andrew B. Sacks and John W. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoggatt et al v. Crawley et al
as 1:2014cv00232
Plaintiff:
Wilton Eric Hoggatt , Victoria Johnson Hoggatt , Plaintiffs 2-10, and others
Defendant:
Allen Crawley, AT&T Mobility LLC, All AT&T Mobility LLC Officers & Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mayflower Restaurant of Asheboro (No.7), LLC et al v. BP, plc et al
as 1:2013cv00185
Plaintiff:
Mayflower Restaurant of Asheboro (No.7), LLC , Mayflower Restaurant of Burlington (No.10), LLC , Mayflower Restaurant of Concord (No.9), LLC and others
Defendant:
BP, plc, BP America, Inc., BP Company North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Huffmaster et al v. Foster et al
as 3:2007cv00676
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Huffmaster, John Doe 1-5 and Jane Doe 1-5
Defendant:
Charles Foster, Janelle Skinner-Weill, D. Andrew Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.